National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Rogers Commission, Appendix F: Personal observations on the reliability of the Shuttle (Richard Feynman)
Report · written 6 June 1986 · released 6 June 1986
Why this matters
Richard Feynman's dissent, attached to the Challenger accident report after he threatened to remove his name. He shows that NASA management put the risk of catastrophic failure at about 1 in 100,000 while its engineers estimated closer to 1 in 100. It ends: 'For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.'
Read the original
https://www.nasa.gov/history/rogersrep/v2appf.htm
Hosted by NASA History Office
Tags
Part of a collection · step 5 of 8
Space Program Post-Mortems
1986: 'nature cannot be fooled.'
Cite
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. "Rogers Commission, Appendix F: Personal observations on the reliability of the Shuttle (Richard Feynman)." 6 June 1986. Released 6 June 1986. https://www.nasa.gov/history/rogersrep/v2appf.htm (accessed via The Quiet Archive, QA-0037).
Shelved nearby
- 1990 QA-0042NASA · Report
The Hubble Space Telescope Optical Systems Failure Report
The investigation into why the $1.5 billion telescope launched with a primary mirror ground to the wrong shape.
- 2003 QA-0047NASA · Report
Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report, Volume II (technical appendices)
The appendix volume behind the headline CAIB report: the technical analyses of the foam strike, debris reconstruction and NASA's organizational failures that doomed Columbia in February 2003.
- 2025 QA-0139NASA · Correspondence
NASA internal planning on how to announce discovery of extraterrestrial life (2025)
A FOIA response showing NASA discussions about how the agency would communicate a confirmed discovery of extraterrestrial life, including a 2025 meeting called to outline a formal communications protocol.
- 2023 QA-0039NASA · Report
NASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team — final report
NASA's first formal study of UAP, by an outside panel of scientists.